PercaZelda
  • Baby: M-m-m
  • Mom: Marxism will prevail?
  • Baby: M-mommy
  • Mom: You are a bourgeois sympathist baby and if you had been educated you would need reeducation. Instead, I will raise you as a communist

ladyhacksaway:

petition to stop using “strong female character” and instead “well-written female character” so that sexist douchebags understand that we’re insulting them for their inability to write 50% of the world’s population and just how fucking basic our expectations are.

I’m an adult, but not like a real adult
anyone between the ages of 18 and 25 (via prettyboystyles)

spicylittletwink:

crystalzelda:

spicylittletwink:

crystalzelda:

Lol nah sorry I’m having a pretty hard time seeing what exactly is so practical about having a woman who advocates killing children in office as president

do you think having a republican is going to be a better choice? that they’ll do better for american people and people abroad? because if there’s an option I haven’t heard about I would love to hear it, sincerely. Doesn’t enchant me to have someone in office who has some of these views but somehow I’m not sure that Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin or Ron Paul are going to be bastions of human rights abroad.

like at these point none of these options are good ones. There’s just bad and worst, and that’s politics in one crappy nutshell.

You’re not making some new and groundbreaking argument here. I made the sake arguments when I was a dumbass democrat. Neither candidate from either party is a bastion for human rights and something’s gotta give, because there are a massive number of people who are screwed over regardless of which party is in office and I really don’t understand how much longer it’s expected to continue. I also have no idea where lesser of two evils rhetoric comes from, what exactly has Hilary done for women’s rights. Saying you’re a feminist doesn’t make you once. I actually don’t really even care to debate this but enough is enough, how many more times is this woman’s literal murderousness gonna be exhausted bc liberals keep throwing up their hands like “lol what can you do”

okay, nothing I said meant to imply I was being ~new or groundbreaking, nothing about what you’re spouting is revolutionary either. I went through your pov as well until I realized that absolutely nothing people were offering with this rhetoric was a viable solution to do anything about anything. To help the situation at all or put anyone in power who didn’t have positively medieval outlook on the majority of the current issues. So again, I ask. What then? What now? Tell me if I have no answers and everything I’m saying is asinine and backwards, illuminate me on where we go from here and what we’re gonna do in 2016 to get someone in office that’s better than any of the current contenders. I’m involved in grassroots movements and have supported 3rd parties and I would like to see the two party system change in this country and I’m involved in political activities that go beyond D/R but that’s not gonna do shit to change 2016, didn’t do much in 2012 or 2008 either

I didn’t bring up feminism or call her one or said anything about her being a better option bc she claimed to be one.

You are definitely implying she’s the better option, you’ve argued this viewpoint for as long as I can remember, and yes there is value in making an active effort to push for abstention from the 2 party system, including not voting and 3rd party voting. You’re justifying putting war criminals in office because it’s just “practical”, which is the exact same argument everyone uses to excuse all forms of bigotry. “It’s just how the world works!” I’m not with it.

Better’s not the word here and you’re not answering my question. Is that the solution? an active effort to push for abstention from the 2 party voting system? We’re already at 50% voting rate? Most elections are at 20%? that’s not a solution that’s working or been working or shows any sign to ever work. we just keep voting Ron Paul and hope for the best?

spicylittletwink:

crystalzelda:

Lol nah sorry I’m having a pretty hard time seeing what exactly is so practical about having a woman who advocates killing children in office as president

do you think having a republican is going to be a better choice? that they’ll do better for american people and people abroad? because if there’s an option I haven’t heard about I would love to hear it, sincerely. Doesn’t enchant me to have someone in office who has some of these views but somehow I’m not sure that Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin or Ron Paul are going to be bastions of human rights abroad.

like at these point none of these options are good ones. There’s just bad and worst, and that’s politics in one crappy nutshell.

You’re not making some new and groundbreaking argument here. I made the sake arguments when I was a dumbass democrat. Neither candidate from either party is a bastion for human rights and something’s gotta give, because there are a massive number of people who are screwed over regardless of which party is in office and I really don’t understand how much longer it’s expected to continue. I also have no idea where lesser of two evils rhetoric comes from, what exactly has Hilary done for women’s rights. Saying you’re a feminist doesn’t make you once. I actually don’t really even care to debate this but enough is enough, how many more times is this woman’s literal murderousness gonna be exhausted bc liberals keep throwing up their hands like “lol what can you do”

okay, nothing I said meant to imply I was being ~new or groundbreaking, nothing about what you’re spouting is revolutionary either. I went through your pov as well until I realized that absolutely nothing people were offering with this rhetoric was a viable solution to do anything about anything. To help the situation at all or put anyone in power who didn’t have positively medieval outlook on the majority of the current issues. So again, I ask. What then? What now? Tell me if I have no answers and everything I’m saying is asinine and backwards, illuminate me on where we go from here and what we’re gonna do in 2016 to get someone in office that’s better than any of the current contenders. I’m involved in grassroots movements and have supported 3rd parties and I would like to see the two party system change in this country and I’m involved in political activities that go beyond D/R but that’s not gonna do shit to change 2016, didn’t do much in 2012 or 2008 either

I didn’t bring up feminism or call her one or said anything about her being a better option bc she claimed to be one.

like, don’t tell me all the things that are wrong with HC for the 1467th time I know, ok, I’m aware of all these skeletons and ugliness and have addressed it several times. In this convo I’m asking for options because I’m not talking about practicality? I’d really like to know what it is we should do then to retain this moral high ground? Not vote? Is that it?

Lol nah sorry I’m having a pretty hard time seeing what exactly is so practical about having a woman who advocates killing children in office as president

do you think having a republican is going to be a better choice? that they’ll do better for american people and people abroad? because if there’s an option I haven’t heard about I would love to hear it, sincerely. Doesn’t enchant me to have someone in office who has some of these views but somehow I’m not sure that Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin or Ron Paul are going to be bastions of human rights abroad.

like at these point none of these options are good ones. There’s just bad and worst, and that’s politics in one crappy nutshell.

omg FUCK all y’all ppl doing tutorials in SAI I HATE ALL Y’ALL

SO MUCH

ppl are cute about politics

yeah, HC has done some pretty horrendous stuff and all these ominous posts about how you have BLOOD on your HANDS if you’re BEING PARTY to her DECISIONS like okay so tell me then. what’s your solution. vote republican 2016? vote for a 3rd party that won’t affect the general election whatsoever on any scale? like at this point tell me about our options if voting makes us baby killers

fuck-yeah-feminist:

"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE MEN?!" - Is Feminism Sexist? (x)

Guess what? Feminism is beneficial for men. But even if it wasn’t, empowering women shouldn’t be limited or defined by what men think is important.